{"id":"W2147610275","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2005.1577960","title":"Vulnerability analysis of IP traceback schemes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"IP traceback; Computer science; Denial-of-service attack; Exploit; Vulnerability (computing); Computer network; Stateless protocol; Computer security; Network packet; Context (archaeology); Overhead (engineering); Probabilistic logic; The Internet; Buffer overflow; Vulnerability assessment","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002127652,0.0005080035,0.0005663014,0.002464276,0.000614788,0.0008931762,0.0007994541,0.0008351691,0.0009587361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150288,0.0002128991,0.0004878471,0.001037911,0.001611628,0.002656254,0.001339353,0.000863586,0.0000945127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001399472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006429572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008182411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000298862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978656,0.0007264131,0.0001303074,0.0001477125,0.0008324841,0.0002975413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876351,0.008411465,0.001383319,0.001343434,0.0009883911,0.000238404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003267964,0.0001635873,0.01213359,0.0002996344,0.00009890195,0.000736589,0.0005716578,0.6862313,0.02582055,0.2243249,0.001411131,0.04788134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007538423,0.0000629266,0.0008009198,0.00001743886,0.00002627227,0.000311502,0.00005976266,0.9725801,0.004572042,0.02103589,0.0005097208,0.00001594232],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5981055,0.001222197,0.389985,0.0008956715,0.00003735374,0.0002156574,0.0001795431,0.0006392496,0.008719829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913088,0.000241777,0.007971331,0.00001940859,0.000007991055,0.00002835313,0.00003312854,0.00001546327,0.0003736652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002464276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01125222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03071157412246555,"score_gpt":0.2957869377449852,"score_spread":0.2650753636225197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}