{"id":"W2147722726","doi":"10.1504/ijvs.2007.015545","title":"Incremental harmonic balance method for analysis of standard/smart vehicles-to-rigid barrier frontal collision","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Vehicle Safety","topic":"Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Collision; Crashworthiness; Crash; Damper; Offset (computer science); Harmonic balance; Nonlinear system; Structural engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Simulation; Control theory (sociology); Finite element method; Control (management); Physics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002115093,0.0001415807,0.0005554868,0.0008017569,0.00006446843,0.00001975809,0.0002954521,0.00008405495,0.0002851501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001888282,0.0001226142,0.0005191982,0.0003718546,0.00004177186,0.0001560842,0.00007313117,0.0001954833,0.000004832404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005484725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001928448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003138695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004267901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976154,0.00004637265,0.0009713111,0.0001856021,0.0009693031,0.0002120411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974631,0.0002332894,0.0005626354,0.0001432167,0.001385899,0.0002118755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04768576,0.0009205841,0.08614161,0.00005893253,0.01356507,0.0002717254,0.001643649,0.0004826807,0.75281,0.003234747,0.004082515,0.08910272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0101666,0.004060145,0.4341706,0.0003554483,0.002620996,0.0001569005,0.0007969491,0.01472639,0.4950227,0.0007319586,0.03683356,0.000357749],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6841456,0.00009748874,0.3137248,0.0006761569,0.0004460746,0.0002027798,0.0004437718,0.000008107017,0.0002552772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624882,0.00004033355,0.03630939,0.0006318293,0.0003029181,0.000001724806,0.00004143708,0.00001792519,0.0001662186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.348029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5000062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02047125886499245,"score_gpt":0.3589589657484162,"score_spread":0.3384877068834237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}