{"id":"W2147781499","doi":"10.7202/004605ar","title":"The Application of Argumentation Theory to Translation Quality Assessment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Weighting; Computer science; Dimension (graph theory); Quality (philosophy); Translation (biology); Quality assessment; Criticism; Focus (optics); Sampling (signal processing); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Evaluation methods; Reliability engineering; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07457104,0.001538638,0.0021462,0.01453466,0.004381479,0.01361262,0.003894817,0.006022206,0.005019864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1468636,0.0008576988,0.002298137,0.0088726,0.02818268,0.01910756,0.008401525,0.005445862,0.0006234696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009471848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005691946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001670579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001030069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8609527,0.1136028,0.005504692,0.003354876,0.01533825,0.001246603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7671107,0.1994372,0.01086148,0.00703437,0.01434814,0.001208095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002455025,0.0000418768,0.0006501139,0.0005097933,0.00006832698,0.0001245292,0.00542659,0.003802191,0.0001244568,0.9487385,0.001088753,0.03940037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002051062,0.00003013069,0.0002148922,0.0002754514,0.00001767276,0.00007714685,0.00121042,0.009304392,0.0001754213,0.9823294,0.006319611,0.00002490242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01607974,0.008088511,0.891294,0.02532998,0.0006142225,0.0003428244,0.00008120354,0.0002084793,0.05796111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6569263,0.004552243,0.3309395,0.001562773,0.0009169526,0.00086167,0.000102019,0.0001237487,0.004014874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07457104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3943741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1698457389525767,"score_gpt":0.3593033040865067,"score_spread":0.1894575651339301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}