{"id":"W2147827032","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12448","title":"Partial recovery of a tropical rain forest a half‐century after clear‐cut and selective logging","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Basal area; Ecological succession; Abundance (ecology); Rainforest; Old-growth forest; Biodiversity; Ecology; Logging; Pioneer species; Secondary forest; Global biodiversity; Quadrat; Species diversity; Biology; Forest restoration; Relative species abundance; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Shrub","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000289351,0.00008049366,0.0002573657,0.00005291567,0.0000482958,0.000004894683,0.00007472729,0.0001047037,0.0001033837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007479781,0.00006807082,0.0000436618,0.00006617187,0.0002825115,0.00008297942,0.0001046303,0.0001976642,0.00002222771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003201528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006051015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007407192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992411,0.00005132676,0.0003101687,0.0001168977,0.0001005828,0.0001799958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994385,0.0001415309,0.0002612509,0.0000502519,0.00002248758,0.00008599307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002907802,0.0002322468,0.9792739,0.00001378718,0.0001594926,0.00005326575,0.002827268,0.009561286,0.0004727032,0.001527088,0.001475109,0.00149604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001366448,0.0009969403,0.9823801,0.000004556153,0.00005387044,0.00007317482,0.0005726064,0.00110428,0.00009587435,0.01191585,0.001337574,0.00009874495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956174,0.00005002295,0.0003476919,0.0004122795,0.0001842851,0.0000911282,9.059419e-7,0.000003532338,0.003292752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981989,0.00005599392,0.001356219,0.0002848767,0.00005660673,0.00000913952,2.80761e-7,0.000005639909,0.00003230944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01038876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2775847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007234622632066755,"score_gpt":0.2186656679667442,"score_spread":0.2114310453346775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}