{"id":"W2147827032","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12448","title":"Partial recovery of a tropical rain forest a half‐century after clear‐cut and selective logging","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Basal area; Ecological succession; Abundance (ecology); Rainforest; Old-growth forest; Biodiversity; Ecology; Logging; Pioneer species; Secondary forest; Global biodiversity; Quadrat; Species diversity; Biology; Forest restoration; Relative species abundance; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Shrub","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003254883,0.0001390711,0.0002028651,0.0003029653,0.0003645551,0.000383372,0.0002752358,0.0002083111,0.001197068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005497723,0.00008866033,0.0002033397,0.000263162,0.000428701,0.0003584264,0.0004618083,0.000294655,0.000151081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003361507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003122119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005373924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01234799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998665,0.000008299722,0.00001133625,0.00003095318,0.00002136449,0.00006159751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994581,0.00003961279,0.0002228707,0.00006057014,0.00007806921,0.0001407232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006353164,0.0001011184,0.9318252,0.0001474961,0.0001588788,0.0008052035,0.0009609492,0.0003769115,0.04081021,0.0001371305,0.0003014573,0.02374009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001329257,0.00003744728,0.9991886,0.000002970146,0.000006641702,0.0000830165,0.0001310758,0.00006099778,0.0003018485,0.0000103328,0.0001741013,0.000001600145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993771,0.0001238609,0.00004157581,0.00001394364,0.000002464371,0.000002848141,0.0001125322,0.000003504152,0.0003221555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995319,0.00004398088,0.00002975986,0.00001589524,0.0000037792,0.000002148742,0.0001940566,7.849657e-7,0.0001777699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005373924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01068527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007234622632066755,"score_gpt":0.2186656679667442,"score_spread":0.2114310453346775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}