{"id":"W2147927650","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009","title":"A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Multimethodology; Critical appraisal; Quality (philosophy); Qualitative property; Systematic review; Management science; MEDLINE; Qualitative analysis; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3075172,0.004100437,0.006793673,0.04933048,0.005433611,0.007579332,0.003993526,0.002851913,0.007217847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4602941,0.002927436,0.01061154,0.03400433,0.004419369,0.006509886,0.01030782,0.004754676,0.001723246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005635695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02149959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002686042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009231111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5781972,0.1665967,0.1940581,0.00420726,0.05436433,0.002576498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4194714,0.2786038,0.05334873,0.01753288,0.2270708,0.003972507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001814775,0.0003528534,0.01811323,0.1205555,0.005309447,0.0006895397,0.01390807,0.001129701,0.01154754,0.02370225,0.06266682,0.7402103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005002731,0.0041532,0.09736758,0.1557999,0.02824362,0.008237268,0.03145086,0.02037047,0.01974043,0.1037566,0.5236087,0.002268736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03612946,0.07893783,0.642771,0.01488362,0.01117488,0.1385526,0.01209155,0.004026575,0.06143255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02622872,0.006592297,0.9118191,0.000790996,0.0003696982,0.05094016,0.001370336,0.0002381426,0.001650648],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6924828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9587728623805185,"score_gpt":0.8557142372490185,"score_spread":0.1030586251315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}