{"id":"W2147927650","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009","title":"A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Multimethodology; Critical appraisal; Quality (philosophy); Qualitative property; Systematic review; Management science; MEDLINE; Qualitative analysis; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9587728623805185,"score_gpt":0.8557142372490185,"score_spread":0.1030586251315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}