{"id":"W2148031765","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v4n11p183","title":"Estimation of Exchange Rate Volatility via GARCH Model: Case Study Sudan (1978 – 2009)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Exchange rate; Volatility (finance); Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Monetary economics; Leverage effect; Leverage (statistics); Depreciation (economics); Stock exchange; Financial economics; Finance; Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001802726,0.0003881803,0.0005332642,0.001125042,0.0004675894,0.0007774926,0.0006224434,0.0007557098,0.0007577409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003534757,0.0002128949,0.0005536405,0.001473212,0.0002305155,0.00058859,0.0005143799,0.0006955821,0.0001452251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006189175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004816417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02905012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01836155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995535,0.0002491548,0.00002935429,0.00005299159,0.00005808847,0.00005695022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980646,0.001392706,0.0001799307,0.000157105,0.0001582873,0.00004744471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003961583,0.0003726132,0.1928051,0.0001887156,0.0004099541,0.005113813,0.0005765305,0.732175,0.001960095,0.01110114,0.002854798,0.05204623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004068006,0.0001653611,0.056763,0.00003703012,0.00008858174,0.0005160454,0.0004210079,0.934358,0.001825302,0.003336282,0.00240833,0.00004041429],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889596,0.000532344,0.008031611,0.0001829631,0.00001091588,0.00001931789,0.0003971801,0.00006473531,0.00180141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938304,0.0002631243,0.004868831,0.00001094621,0.00001257402,0.000009888331,0.0004660923,0.0000102908,0.0005279285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02905012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05776203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05695029611530092,"score_gpt":0.2824985554354132,"score_spread":0.2255482593201123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}