{"id":"W2148089962","doi":"10.1111/j.1369-6866.2004.00296.x","title":"Ideas, private institutions and American welfare state ‘exceptionalism’: the case of health and old‐age insurance, 1915–1965","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Welfare","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Legislation; Welfare state; Social security; Exceptionalism; Scholarship; State (computer science); Welfare; Norm (philosophy); Social Welfare; Political science; Social insurance; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Law and economics; Public economics; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003244349,0.0001523964,0.0001943076,0.001443491,0.01141539,0.006074346,0.0006470775,0.00251536,0.002309103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00263993,0.0002288254,0.0003675079,0.001453359,0.02364767,0.003941826,0.004550825,0.003458674,0.00007917797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01727482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007827079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07443054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08714729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981067,0.0005798612,0.0000531953,0.0001514501,0.0002096544,0.0008990737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999017,0.0004281073,0.0001779202,0.00007859903,0.00009849364,0.0001999006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007684165,0.00001364441,0.0008852792,0.000003863498,0.000002392469,0.00006761082,0.007807713,0.0001688734,0.00002486602,0.9889138,0.0004939379,0.001610219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006558403,0.00006086275,0.02677722,0.0002099375,0.00004741452,0.0003031336,0.03887297,0.001920778,0.0006335957,0.6804992,0.2505472,0.00006204813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6975873,0.002881455,0.002209881,0.03302694,0.0001434953,0.00003462105,0.0001122311,0.00002501661,0.263979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953816,0.000298491,0.0001525603,0.0005323357,0.00004003069,0.00001173086,0.00001593073,0.000002734566,0.003564673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07443054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1479946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02826186918742041,"score_gpt":0.3689584431950538,"score_spread":0.3406965740076334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}