{"id":"W2148162120","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00222.x","title":"Parliamentary and judicial ambivalence toward executive prerogative powers in <scp>C</scp>anada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Ambivalence; Political science; Law; Legislature; Parliament; Power (physics); Executive power; Statutory law; Humanities; Politics; Philosophy; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003287153,0.000103728,0.0001176157,0.0001242972,0.0006210709,0.00008850918,0.0001069062,0.00008917261,0.00004825111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009373306,0.0001169051,0.0000227861,0.0003230684,0.0006266094,0.0007096878,0.00001770681,0.0001150913,0.00001365722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005362059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002414387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2077183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9162556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987426,0.000116938,0.0001581715,0.000185083,0.0002562552,0.0005408924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.0001787866,0.00006061389,0.00005181639,0.00006732155,0.0005897688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004124508,0.00005222321,0.1008107,0.000004493729,0.00002442671,0.00001973821,0.01705565,1.037635e-7,0.00001262068,0.8709968,0.007669541,0.003349566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003918996,0.000130408,0.1364594,0.00004225033,0.00002467745,0.00000748182,0.1722435,0.000005973397,0.0001444137,0.01828676,0.6720389,0.0002243916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8191474,0.0009426512,0.00004112418,0.03028787,0.00063837,0.0004828605,0.00009324982,0.00003461171,0.1483319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983367,0.0001503938,0.00003771779,0.0009413121,0.0003207239,0.00003635711,0.00002011029,0.000004160192,0.0001525562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8527101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7975575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03555248779724102,"score_gpt":0.2822290438318493,"score_spread":0.2466765560346083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}