{"id":"W2148162120","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00222.x","title":"Parliamentary and judicial ambivalence toward executive prerogative powers in <scp>C</scp>anada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Ambivalence; Political science; Law; Legislature; Parliament; Power (physics); Executive power; Statutory law; Humanities; Politics; Philosophy; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008886104,0.0001218501,0.0002816568,0.001701612,0.02902767,0.01373475,0.001189232,0.002270855,0.004169181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02212791,0.0003133074,0.0001919912,0.001816741,0.02358331,0.001711102,0.002474302,0.004551356,0.0002025425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08403017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08096331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876142,0.002717397,0.0002899245,0.0009564978,0.004553443,0.003868585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981186,0.00715124,0.001530614,0.000561967,0.007225203,0.002344901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007397872,0.00006203879,0.02105786,0.00008337943,0.00002553206,0.001104097,0.1331992,0.0004107876,0.001440882,0.8061392,0.01957254,0.01683055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006684137,0.0001018302,0.1377281,0.0005362362,0.00009659402,0.000557464,0.318493,0.001640129,0.00227424,0.07620941,0.4620484,0.0002476977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5922358,0.001488951,0.001091197,0.04576094,0.000178795,0.00005635792,0.00009705168,0.00003361074,0.3590572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942849,0.0001471017,0.00006613448,0.001171261,0.00001789237,0.000004489478,0.000004803498,0.000003886543,0.004299616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08509147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6096843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03555248779724102,"score_gpt":0.2822290438318493,"score_spread":0.2466765560346083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}