{"id":"W2148290296","doi":"10.1002/for.1116","title":"Risk factor beta conditional value‐at‐risk","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forecasting","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Econometrics; Economics; Value at risk; Index (typography); Benchmark (surveying); Value (mathematics); Percentile; Asset (computer security); Capital asset pricing model; Portfolio optimization; Estimation; Financial economics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Risk management; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002955978,0.0008370856,0.0009690273,0.00192453,0.0002975088,0.002378747,0.00105541,0.0007694909,0.004963653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02149161,0.0003906905,0.0006762819,0.001154299,0.0008979882,0.002667776,0.0008184493,0.001682485,0.0007910078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009544151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005737257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004012191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001616786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987055,0.0004198151,0.00004780616,0.0002875025,0.0004243824,0.0001148747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932573,0.004166405,0.0009666846,0.0007156623,0.0007562815,0.000137725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001299618,0.00006491913,0.02435617,0.0000834875,0.0002901308,0.0003004477,0.0001872713,0.634225,0.00154841,0.2530439,0.003424203,0.0823462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001282071,0.00003694319,0.007013883,0.00004173922,0.00004011377,0.0001348293,0.00002416503,0.8269634,0.001010171,0.162982,0.001685111,0.00005484513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1284143,0.001186876,0.8593338,0.0005226584,0.0001138299,0.0000769582,0.0004972265,0.0004647516,0.00938971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492058,0.0009192404,0.04548266,0.00007239931,0.000187188,0.00007006155,0.0005666274,0.00007421381,0.003421753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004963653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01660514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06788871973516089,"score_gpt":0.2194512127725527,"score_spread":0.1515624930373918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}