{"id":"W2148349940","doi":"10.1109/aiccsa.2008.4493600","title":"A novel flow-sensitive type and effect analysis for securing C code","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Security and Verification in Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Alias; Static analysis; Type inference; Memory safety; Information flow; Aliasing; Source code; Abstract interpretation; Programming language; Program analysis; Static program analysis; Type safety; Type (biology); Code (set theory); Point (geometry); Interface (matter); Undecidable problem; Control flow; Theoretical computer science; Inference; Data mining; Parallel computing; Compiler; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002217245,0.00007454106,0.0001411067,0.0001075399,0.000213862,0.00005038031,0.0001622959,0.00003261765,0.000002659143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008757252,0.00006719462,0.00005336968,0.000718281,0.00002812789,0.0001319847,0.00008573884,0.00004702909,0.000005214391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001296904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000215194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002820651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001499529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993629,0.00002227489,0.0001109245,0.0002778671,0.0000907698,0.0001352229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992005,0.0003760591,0.000038283,0.0002126671,0.0001236238,0.00004889628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004231086,0.000823737,0.09751407,0.0004542258,0.005272464,0.0001050917,0.06554819,0.05380206,0.04622415,0.6362256,0.005722758,0.08788452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002824635,0.00006838077,0.01121997,0.000004143997,0.00003136939,0.00003030129,0.00001317886,0.9822245,0.005475475,0.0001002085,0.0004419309,0.0001081187],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1503887,0.00002641341,0.8486308,0.0001334193,0.0001000152,0.0001010176,0.00000192417,0.00009498218,0.0005226113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8525048,0.000005655285,0.1471989,0.0001725383,0.00004024911,0.000004284221,0.000002782021,0.000002862159,0.00006786586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2740117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03712901564060711,"score_gpt":0.2728291378664789,"score_spread":0.2357001222258718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}