{"id":"W2148360110","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2013.791205","title":"Quantitative Ecological Risk Analysis by Evaluating China's Eco-Efficiency and Its Determinants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Industrialisation; China; Investment (military); Data envelopment analysis; Government (linguistics); Promotion (chess); Pollution; Business; Natural resource economics; Tertiary sector of the economy; Production (economics); Eco-efficiency; Environmental economics; Economics; Environmental protection; Economy; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Sustainable development; Microeconomics; Market economy; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008688514,0.0003244808,0.0006919853,0.0008290582,0.00171669,0.002654709,0.001247201,0.0001912973,0.005972652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005035107,0.0002083579,0.0003198886,0.0007092081,0.0003157403,0.001396304,0.0004121652,0.0008723611,0.0001220145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001789813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007491402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001081654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002243954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930494,0.001878935,0.001424824,0.0009508615,0.002184996,0.0005109258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946052,0.002026402,0.001581072,0.0002637322,0.001079576,0.0004440505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003115677,0.001041722,0.9744525,0.000001000017,0.0004689681,0.00004234895,0.0004242547,0.003727953,0.0007366039,0.002007612,0.000590662,0.01647522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004219391,0.001035295,0.6450136,0.000004549779,0.0002343835,0.00002495968,0.0005440167,0.3328709,0.000007915878,0.01957229,0.00007561375,0.0001945744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914266,0.0001401042,0.006581369,0.0004369698,0.0002894991,0.0002200133,0.00005881698,0.00003191214,0.0008147196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994641,0.0004224825,0.004247843,0.000164225,0.0001294179,0.00002148689,0.00001759893,0.000009621655,0.0003463453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3294389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1116159223626775,"score_gpt":0.4870149129742848,"score_spread":0.3753989906116073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}