{"id":"W2148364797","doi":"10.1109/mwsym.1996.511039","title":"A modified method-of-moments technique for the full-wave analysis of imperfect conductors on lossy and finite-extent substrates","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Method of moments (probability theory); Perfect conductor; Conductor; Lossy compression; Electrical conductor; Dielectric; Ground plane; Materials science; Boundary value problem; Electrical impedance; Dielectric loss; Electronic engineering; Acoustics; Optics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Optoelectronics; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Composite material; Antenna (radio); Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002417934,0.000130923,0.0003447887,0.0001844767,0.00006169138,0.00001800026,0.00009432596,0.00002816366,0.0005102772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001055387,0.00008303411,0.000280376,0.0004818734,0.00005473471,0.00002194302,0.00001860803,0.00006372033,6.157284e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005903345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005691952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003194454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006366269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992247,0.00004756394,0.0002587689,0.0002028013,0.0001045281,0.00016169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988478,0.0006712056,0.0001376841,0.0002476551,0.00005933737,0.00003625493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001553648,0.001152071,0.02817157,0.0001178994,0.01892997,0.000001138108,0.0015737,0.01965855,0.847938,0.02181481,0.0007145147,0.05977243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007294876,0.0009642057,0.003882894,0.0000313332,0.004442678,7.363628e-7,0.0006132674,0.414362,0.5723343,0.002264738,0.0000449435,0.0003293859],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8846536,0.00008841114,0.1135707,0.0001343061,0.00001280151,0.0002809166,0.00005231391,0.00001258836,0.001194398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960548,0.00001342004,0.003192473,0.00001601358,0.00001923092,0.00008176031,0.00001432154,0.000008006909,0.0006000252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3947035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5587177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03722886507442345,"score_gpt":0.2881765231615019,"score_spread":0.2509476580870784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}