{"id":"W2148389197","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01613.x","title":"Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Lakehead University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Resource distribution; Abundance (ecology); Variety (cybernetics); Logistic function; Competition (biology); Function (biology); Computer science; Biology; Resource allocation; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005157815,0.0009825428,0.001270348,0.001875948,0.000894992,0.002463582,0.002084843,0.002018509,0.002982781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02594179,0.0006743252,0.00143414,0.001466444,0.002910595,0.005721129,0.001602809,0.001893512,0.0004428301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002420738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001283756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01972024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01188793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984455,0.0008628995,0.00006348163,0.000240597,0.0001900275,0.0001975785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871815,0.009866896,0.001012509,0.0005777201,0.0008487952,0.000512482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003763575,0.00005556334,0.0224275,0.000133745,0.0001823047,0.0004427269,0.0005110558,0.4327091,0.001162119,0.5210577,0.002619967,0.01866051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004767763,0.00001806296,0.003886638,0.00002118762,0.00001643546,0.0001076214,0.0001048945,0.8011217,0.00007282867,0.1927161,0.001907425,0.00002245086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1474969,0.002180316,0.8341267,0.005364683,0.000179751,0.00005056069,0.0002435401,0.0001985886,0.01015904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8956752,0.002737127,0.08978,0.0007804022,0.0005516291,0.0001767416,0.0003291929,0.0002790284,0.009690747],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01972024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03921092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02889197107645333,"score_gpt":0.2753645208688769,"score_spread":0.2464725497924235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}