{"id":"W2148525507","doi":"10.1017/s1355770x02000177","title":"Technological change and tropical deforestation: a perspective at the household level","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Development Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Deforestation (computer science); Clearing; Context (archaeology); Technological change; Agriculture; Perspective (graphical); Natural resource economics; Developing country; Economics; Tropical forest; Development economics; Geography; Economic growth; Ecology; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008344011,0.0001193542,0.00008528473,0.00002243927,0.0004353174,0.00003276889,0.00009730654,0.00005362402,0.001226826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004025141,0.00008822981,0.00001631648,0.00002578783,0.0005387143,0.00008315397,0.0005821528,0.00006290839,0.0002481681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003455374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000127514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002296576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000862948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993261,0.00001604428,0.0001213059,0.0002953252,0.00007956919,0.000161656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997464,0.00002452438,0.00004784191,0.0001210863,7.738902e-7,0.00005939466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008096251,0.00004803382,0.9697568,0.000002191331,0.00001876665,0.000002587165,0.002497165,0.00006163695,0.000006054372,0.0002914279,0.000448201,0.026859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002337034,0.00001820746,0.8097183,0.00000114806,0.000007152047,0.000004696295,0.0008133677,0.0002834625,0.00002428706,0.0001311806,0.1886445,0.0001200904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937884,0.0002223844,0.0001676656,0.003715828,0.00002043446,0.0002550634,0.000005832167,0.0000214938,0.00180291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925539,0.001835427,0.001548113,0.0008127944,0.00002169123,0.0000439001,0.000005342,0.000007287664,0.003171567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1881963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08442173917429763,"score_gpt":0.1738143279130002,"score_spread":0.08939258873870262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}