{"id":"W2148525507","doi":"10.1017/s1355770x02000177","title":"Technological change and tropical deforestation: a perspective at the household level","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Development Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Deforestation (computer science); Clearing; Context (archaeology); Technological change; Agriculture; Perspective (graphical); Natural resource economics; Developing country; Economics; Tropical forest; Development economics; Geography; Economic growth; Ecology; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004782845,0.0003015915,0.0003697158,0.001285926,0.001269598,0.002050906,0.0003691658,0.001096777,0.01346093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001671848,0.0001310352,0.0005540919,0.003519985,0.001738242,0.001855786,0.00129474,0.0009116595,0.000384439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001555665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000586148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01575616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0295154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993758,0.0003058617,0.00001069379,0.00004110106,0.00003724776,0.0002292883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978634,0.001310289,0.0004769507,0.00005905105,0.00009535989,0.000194905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001771397,0.0005065904,0.5394775,0.0003515279,0.0004644644,0.002638133,0.006561702,0.03439034,0.001150155,0.3632939,0.004808759,0.04617985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004599185,0.0007672739,0.7204461,0.000477761,0.000600483,0.001369769,0.04526482,0.03815595,0.00147011,0.1563279,0.0349797,0.00009408492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386923,0.00692773,0.005022179,0.006060997,0.00005876908,0.00002899343,0.0006749855,0.00001438292,0.04251966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945005,0.00326148,0.0004750848,0.0001807594,0.00005038805,0.00001389651,0.00007657673,0.000002822983,0.001438517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01575616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04503131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08442173917429763,"score_gpt":0.1738143279130002,"score_spread":0.08939258873870262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}