{"id":"W2148526875","doi":"10.2514/6.2010-2866","title":"A Probabilistic Study of Composite Impact Damage Design Strain Allowables","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Composite number; Probabilistic logic; Strain (injury); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Structural engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00368241,0.0004471658,0.0003910208,0.001403593,0.0003093147,0.0005827909,0.0007603615,0.0004450238,0.001416994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01142643,0.0004753841,0.0005992259,0.0007451809,0.0006304435,0.0007542759,0.0005087565,0.0005916528,0.0001716835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001003358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006210163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002024363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002487781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974395,0.0006420194,0.0000720731,0.000297205,0.001403581,0.0001457108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910909,0.006349835,0.0008473457,0.0006189083,0.001028393,0.00006469972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003704627,0.00001991782,0.003004776,0.00002658079,0.00001648944,0.00004334536,0.00003249344,0.9726338,0.002000465,0.008174665,0.0001121583,0.01389819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002616751,0.00008083074,0.002814954,0.000005055902,0.000008037992,0.00008027554,0.00001110688,0.9927496,0.001360106,0.002312377,0.0005647169,0.00001032975],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3228343,0.0004289113,0.6643065,0.0001340523,0.00001810017,0.00007235984,0.00014395,0.0001629146,0.01189899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695947,0.0001049053,0.02889358,0.00001390887,0.00001199684,0.00005988762,0.00008855815,0.00002568212,0.001206774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00368241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01947463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1033935159794685,"score_gpt":0.3688487730751625,"score_spread":0.265455257095694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}