{"id":"W2148579602","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2013-0534","title":"Home range and habitat use by Magellanic Woodpeckers in an old-growth forest of Patagonia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas","keywords":"Woodpecker; Habitat; Home range; Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Old-growth forest; Coarse woody debris; Forestry; Snag; Forest management; Population; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001016593,0.0001363212,0.0001349157,0.0004603781,0.0002181102,0.0002682362,0.0002048488,0.0001581443,0.0007905749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002577647,0.00009597401,0.0001247573,0.0003256525,0.0001869258,0.0001508981,0.0002390137,0.0001445193,0.000104617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003088824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007911027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02368126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08126988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999331,0.00001177732,0.00000319306,0.00002502163,0.000008231034,0.00001863906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998085,0.00002178044,0.00008803172,0.00001205538,0.00001496282,0.00005460418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001074345,0.00004304284,0.9929767,0.00001118308,0.00002817004,0.0002110254,0.0006738155,0.00007247782,0.002413596,0.00001036099,0.000117101,0.003335152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.142102e-7,0.00001170096,0.9997048,8.847141e-7,0.000001644769,0.00004234728,0.0001327942,0.00003206769,0.00001403536,0.000001625985,0.00005673294,6.557573e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998084,0.00002841445,0.000008075021,0.000003339932,4.345937e-7,9.282081e-7,0.00004656746,8.351558e-7,0.0001031418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997781,0.0000209558,0.00002745325,0.000005718277,0.000001100902,0.000001523396,0.00009184729,4.813966e-7,0.00007276223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02368126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04708683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02542784001039154,"score_gpt":0.2572667690034784,"score_spread":0.2318389289930869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}