{"id":"W2148687511","doi":"10.1109/tap.2012.2230233","title":"Performance Evaluation of Conductive-Paper Dipole Antennas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","topic":"RFID technology advancements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Electrical conductor; Dipole antenna; Antenna (radio); Conductor; Dipole; Conductivity; Radiation; Antenna efficiency; Copper; Materials science; Ultra high frequency; Optoelectronics; Loop antenna; Radiation pattern; Electrical engineering; Acoustics; Computer science; Optics; Physics; Telecommunications; Coaxial antenna; Engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002931645,0.0001107123,0.000111834,0.0001317614,0.00008921079,0.000005654817,0.00004302324,0.0000793258,0.0001056422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000450034,0.0001049897,0.00002456128,0.0001660941,0.0000730792,0.0005958469,5.413799e-7,0.0001356794,0.00002610866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005185256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009512644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003508926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000354916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993231,0.00002960247,0.0001785107,0.0001033675,0.000198202,0.0001672339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966,0.00001452937,0.00003870321,0.0001396666,0.0001098744,0.00003727913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007396281,0.0002528575,0.002297577,0.0001472962,0.0001461219,2.446409e-7,0.0007028691,0.02148815,0.6349309,0.0002085046,0.00003848404,0.339713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001104389,0.0001787522,0.02123546,0.0001110228,0.0001500946,0.00001693788,0.0002280372,0.3643331,0.6119194,0.0001275592,0.0003200957,0.000275116],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9084702,0.0003608181,0.08949182,0.00003961353,0.0004718439,0.0002986036,0.000008503447,0.0001251339,0.0007334814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989803,0.000339465,0.0004929636,0.00001646272,0.00001678337,0.00006567618,0.000003469818,0.00001689547,0.00006791249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.342845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4281357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02658320765203932,"score_gpt":0.2564836642497958,"score_spread":0.2299004565977565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}