{"id":"W2148779162","doi":"10.1115/1.802977.paper218","title":"Information Literacy Training of Public Libraries: A Case from Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ASME Press eBooks","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Focus group; Medical education; Quality (philosophy); Literacy; Training (meteorology); Public relations; Order (exchange); Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Business; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001149315,0.0004184441,0.0003629584,0.001580455,0.02588914,0.003944513,0.002071041,0.002373146,0.00454494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006144201,0.0004320329,0.0003180296,0.005147861,0.003772013,0.001367789,0.002914737,0.002254173,0.0004396009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08198567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1118994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9634089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968396,0.000492496,0.00007673153,0.0001152072,0.0008097171,0.001666159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952235,0.001156557,0.0003356535,0.0001300751,0.001231558,0.001922703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002475171,0.00107892,0.08639493,0.0009244439,0.00003809382,0.1947453,0.4770356,0.001846795,0.002345406,0.03089077,0.0461087,0.1583437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004677007,0.0001902563,0.06089478,0.0008486636,0.00006966827,0.04011612,0.6847857,0.00165184,0.002043777,0.002066335,0.2071554,0.0001306447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070593,0.001747709,0.0006068919,0.01754502,0.00009049111,0.0001311047,0.0001764644,0.00007541077,0.07256763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780573,0.001886144,0.00082284,0.002286275,0.00004169738,0.00003089871,0.00005695389,0.00003110155,0.01678672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08198567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5948505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05450687624615014,"score_gpt":0.2587830165938944,"score_spread":0.2042761403477442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}