{"id":"W2148807980","doi":"10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000081","title":"Structural Condition Assessment of Sewer Pipelines","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Sensitivity (control systems); Engineering; Artificial neural network; Range (aeronautics); Variable (mathematics); Structural engineering; Pipeline (software); Civil engineering; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Machine learning; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000417905,0.0004566287,0.0002796974,0.0007942069,0.0002213849,0.0005181076,0.0004403365,0.000541253,0.001221685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002058089,0.0002181193,0.0003528767,0.0004476648,0.0003046394,0.0004966978,0.0003018804,0.000225018,0.000169068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001238371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006174663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04529896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04403718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997049,0.00005555997,0.00001615528,0.00006162145,0.0001286034,0.0000330614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994619,0.0001908639,0.00009697468,0.00003704959,0.0001925479,0.00002063923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002589546,0.00006833711,0.05385429,0.00009516712,0.0000421928,0.0001832696,0.0001370144,0.8878932,0.0236131,0.0003122586,0.0002439317,0.03329834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003819948,0.00009635883,0.03299174,0.000006466182,0.00001459197,0.00002892759,0.0000745638,0.9596817,0.006746272,0.0001666612,0.000177378,0.00001148419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966028,0.00006764935,0.03170773,0.00003317792,0.000005309926,0.00003637209,0.0003452465,0.0002167897,0.001559744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982558,0.00002462859,0.001184624,0.000001620982,6.92248e-7,0.000006562043,0.0001045807,0.00000344793,0.0004178737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04529896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09007061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006338857869844115,"score_gpt":0.2253871998561036,"score_spread":0.2190483419862594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}