{"id":"W2148863517","doi":"10.1108/14725961011019085","title":"Two condition indicators for building components based on reactive‐maintenance data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Facilities Management","topic":"Facilities and Workplace Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fluidigm (Canada); University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Operability; Asset management; Asset (computer security); Work (physics); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Facility management; Sample (material); Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Operations management; Business; Operations research; Engineering; Finance; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001523729,0.0004734427,0.0002910019,0.004097646,0.000326278,0.001067249,0.0006586984,0.000427343,0.002696472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01072068,0.0001735241,0.0003315918,0.002535564,0.0004919143,0.0008731813,0.0007290273,0.0004627635,0.0005145395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001623261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001182956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03032333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04226478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987017,0.0002206684,0.0001662658,0.0001587804,0.0006371919,0.0001153225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894243,0.003761628,0.002716867,0.0007765617,0.002960938,0.0003596285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004843796,0.0002405717,0.8657442,0.0001723283,0.00004806557,0.00007063505,0.0006970338,0.0185713,0.00384061,0.00147881,0.001674525,0.1069775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001767228,0.0002490541,0.9244437,0.00005936977,0.00004302014,0.00009220556,0.0007986038,0.06629682,0.005043611,0.0009786531,0.00192428,0.00005299244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132765,0.0001479171,0.07220665,0.0001103583,0.0000178307,0.0004287242,0.006492694,0.0006949447,0.006624509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744717,0.0000406386,0.02257717,0.000008808382,0.000004693607,0.0001147731,0.002255345,0.00001119495,0.0005157462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03032333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06029367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03832488581855707,"score_gpt":0.3359508755716722,"score_spread":0.2976259897531152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}