{"id":"W2148866655","doi":"10.1017/jfm.2011.260","title":"Linear stability analysis of capillary instabilities for concentric cylindrical shells","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Breakup; Concentric; Rotational symmetry; Viscosity; Mechanics; Capillary action; Shell (structure); Stability (learning theory); Work (physics); Flow (mathematics); Linear stability; Stokes flow; Stokes' law; Physics; Instability; Stokes number; Limiting; Materials science; Geometry; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Turbulence; Reynolds number; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005656133,0.0001455975,0.0006002396,0.0002493863,0.00002615526,0.000006772163,0.0001997983,0.0001299972,0.0002078057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006996549,0.0001272626,0.0004940906,0.0004796046,0.0000240657,0.0001159755,0.00001405518,0.0001831243,9.891173e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001010593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007420667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000082796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985715,0.00002855612,0.0008263314,0.0001037887,0.0002465814,0.0002232032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990402,0.0001355677,0.00006898474,0.0002135962,0.0004159023,0.0001257828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002338264,0.002473414,0.007865688,0.003374377,0.0183781,0.0001048305,0.02428939,0.182608,0.5780106,0.1687599,0.001008376,0.01078913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006785902,0.0004276467,0.0005701963,0.00002431659,0.00120167,0.000007712641,0.0003083596,0.949406,0.0455997,0.001128355,0.0004703221,0.0001771725],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.74261,0.001500275,0.254867,0.0000145928,0.0004890948,0.0001595312,0.00009243649,0.00002115773,0.000245896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914478,0.001267406,0.007167223,0.00002047127,0.00006190749,0.000002529873,0.000005033272,0.00002350065,0.000004138641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.766798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5189619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03672212927875862,"score_gpt":0.2232202325315119,"score_spread":0.1864981032527533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}