{"id":"W2148866655","doi":"10.1017/jfm.2011.260","title":"Linear stability analysis of capillary instabilities for concentric cylindrical shells","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Breakup; Concentric; Rotational symmetry; Viscosity; Mechanics; Capillary action; Shell (structure); Stability (learning theory); Work (physics); Flow (mathematics); Linear stability; Stokes flow; Stokes' law; Physics; Instability; Stokes number; Limiting; Materials science; Geometry; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Turbulence; Reynolds number; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003630726,0.000412258,0.0003559025,0.0005990501,0.0004040443,0.0006664241,0.0004528422,0.0005089767,0.0008235811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001407304,0.0002006624,0.0004169732,0.0001938441,0.001108583,0.0003925505,0.0008347167,0.0003173453,0.0001521845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005401161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005244238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002751148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009991775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998393,0.00003821623,0.000007167316,0.00002666663,0.00005073533,0.00003789139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994385,0.0001924818,0.0001510899,0.00003209334,0.0001270933,0.0000586957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002813495,0.00007008816,0.00420093,0.000108654,0.00005470039,0.000680151,0.000377721,0.7424718,0.1608933,0.08179561,0.0005295603,0.00853608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004925796,0.00002178885,0.0002883897,0.000002797468,0.00000219492,0.00002701329,0.00001822818,0.9944126,0.003078636,0.002057126,0.00007938224,0.000006921581],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8775299,0.0002303345,0.1147052,0.0001562942,0.00001410555,0.00004153027,0.00003666848,0.0001591121,0.007126868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934621,0.00004148896,0.005515703,0.00001330193,0.00000553819,0.00001839361,0.00001489884,0.00001607974,0.0009125182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002751148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005470335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03672212927875862,"score_gpt":0.2232202325315119,"score_spread":0.1864981032527533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}