{"id":"W2149017503","doi":"10.1109/robot.2000.845173","title":"An eigenscrew analysis of mechanism compliance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Matrix (chemical analysis); Wrench; Mechanism (biology); Automation; Computer science; Robotics; Control theory (sociology); Compliance (psychology); Control engineering; Displacement (psychology); Robot; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering; Control (management); Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004840585,0.0004354518,0.0003771925,0.001286417,0.0002879628,0.0005440413,0.0004233105,0.0003740509,0.00476947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001583604,0.0003045639,0.0004727512,0.00052135,0.0006690877,0.001152443,0.0005639623,0.0003843813,0.0006975523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002326043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004840516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005222131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004151802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996263,0.00005091533,0.00001511589,0.00007545776,0.0001982598,0.00003394197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995157,0.0001304681,0.0000720925,0.00009013264,0.0001659932,0.00002572634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002000061,0.0001573072,0.003380812,0.0002537546,0.00009573463,0.000438634,0.0004029314,0.2271525,0.2276739,0.2347724,0.003741639,0.3017304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001516134,0.0001031699,0.004022229,0.00002257965,0.00001627077,0.0003079905,0.00006750012,0.9330604,0.01309259,0.04444144,0.004803713,0.00004688613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05790589,0.00021923,0.9335341,0.00008543842,0.00003538912,0.00004060441,0.0000893449,0.0004174451,0.007672413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8050117,0.0005680544,0.181686,0.00008455684,0.0000714878,0.0001796881,0.0002705491,0.000194329,0.01193363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00476947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01595551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03447192139424241,"score_gpt":0.2308603938777912,"score_spread":0.1963884724835488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}