{"id":"W2149065333","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1994.400012","title":"Graphical forms for preference representation: considerations for practical application","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Data Management and Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Carleton University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Computer science; Schema (genetic algorithms); Representation (politics); Flexibility (engineering); Process (computing); Preference elicitation; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science; Machine learning; Information retrieval; Data mining; Human–computer interaction; Programming language; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03137979,0.002488503,0.002317715,0.004074967,0.001870773,0.01762991,0.005455641,0.006100895,0.04137854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1331525,0.001844593,0.002566301,0.008354455,0.005736654,0.01595228,0.004137815,0.006001516,0.01518332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002391287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002948837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003252243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003199617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.966714,0.02621118,0.001803717,0.001136743,0.003691377,0.0004429487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8925391,0.08004539,0.002097506,0.01304458,0.0112566,0.00101681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001629073,0.00008430766,0.0004218283,0.0006015201,0.00004405388,0.0001998965,0.0008403222,0.008168427,0.0006615173,0.8650624,0.018099,0.1056539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001655824,0.0001309045,0.0003343115,0.001183254,0.00005956743,0.0007169635,0.0009443155,0.05883802,0.001117073,0.8190547,0.1173179,0.000137331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001234148,0.001824496,0.9703446,0.006574081,0.0002954624,0.0005101819,0.0003770192,0.001501216,0.01733877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02543391,0.002360748,0.9636298,0.0009113427,0.0003744538,0.001622021,0.0004813459,0.0004863255,0.004700048],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04137854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1659542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1606961610271154,"score_gpt":0.3428448717452218,"score_spread":0.1821487107181064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}