{"id":"W2149130669","doi":"10.1109/tbme.2010.2092430","title":"Subspace Methods for Identification of Human Ankle Joint Stiffness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","topic":"Structural Health Monitoring Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Torque; Control theory (sociology); Stiffness; Subspace topology; Joint stiffness; Reflex; Joint (building); Exoskeleton; Ankle; Noise (video); Computer science; Position (finance); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Simulation; Structural engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008638959,0.0006939056,0.000692614,0.0008402698,0.0003501439,0.0005100641,0.0005011439,0.0006078184,0.001462954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003692514,0.0003707142,0.0005378372,0.0009628197,0.0004550421,0.000782218,0.0006790066,0.000753046,0.0006048794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003381905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009241355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004558965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002917802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994079,0.0002447334,0.0000315038,0.00008922004,0.0001969872,0.00002975926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986876,0.0008016467,0.0001193878,0.0001303767,0.0002342789,0.00002671789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001259578,0.00005375742,0.0006882905,0.0002100806,0.0001114825,0.00004486446,0.0001455931,0.6047149,0.01147564,0.01815365,0.001543321,0.3627325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008075506,0.00002049593,0.0003106744,0.00000668401,0.000004086013,0.0000199787,0.0000114759,0.9916202,0.0008541987,0.00639154,0.0007416355,0.00001095889],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002899091,0.0002177827,0.9963596,0.00002380096,0.00001023872,0.00001348135,0.00002762548,0.0002360967,0.0002121832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2307469,0.001034851,0.7645692,0.00005670329,0.00007186647,0.0003554371,0.0003947996,0.000142387,0.002627868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004558965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009064853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02535222349198981,"score_gpt":0.3439442215265195,"score_spread":0.3185919980345298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}