{"id":"W2149159805","doi":"10.1505/ifor.6.1.40.32061","title":"The key literature of, and trends in, forest-level management planning in North America, 1950–2001","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Forestry Review","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Forest management; Geography; Environmental resource management; Regional science; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003241386,0.0002700553,0.0003299403,0.007567967,0.00135148,0.003651111,0.0006839041,0.0007243669,0.005314632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00915394,0.0003361273,0.0002244264,0.02757874,0.002285664,0.003327368,0.0009710144,0.001521803,0.0004291383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01209648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01506954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1105562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1681906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985493,0.0003476886,0.0001345322,0.0002157619,0.0006725749,0.00008013068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897127,0.005078327,0.00104227,0.0002239709,0.003690682,0.0002520847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007163695,0.00005313102,0.008239476,0.006557706,0.00004725364,0.0002180571,0.004152885,0.002634899,0.0003793963,0.07129499,0.120461,0.7858896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005525829,0.00002801133,0.04492617,0.007356409,0.00004403557,0.0002002168,0.00253549,0.0005944349,0.0002319687,0.008306652,0.935748,0.00002313207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01184835,0.8722548,0.001822958,0.03191666,0.001259461,0.0000280202,0.000499573,0.00004452369,0.0803256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1168349,0.8577748,0.003729624,0.004127434,0.001380138,0.00007104762,0.0007771258,0.00002558919,0.01527938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2198253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02605155777303628,"score_gpt":0.2920138693929297,"score_spread":0.2659623116198934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}