{"id":"W2149177425","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2008.920718","title":"Models for Quantifying the Economic Benefits of Distributed Generation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributed generation; Economic dispatch; Distributed power generation; Cost–benefit analysis; Economic impact analysis; Industrial organization; Business; Environmental economics; Computer science; Economics; Electric power system; Risk analysis (engineering); Power (physics); Microeconomics; Engineering; Renewable energy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001492245,0.001459658,0.000832641,0.001132676,0.0005404289,0.001881327,0.002065237,0.002305818,0.008203476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004778568,0.0005992679,0.0008991409,0.001472779,0.001005806,0.002732502,0.001183618,0.001919921,0.001004919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001999714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001195832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005216078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004842718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994641,0.0001757774,0.00002087022,0.00007268488,0.000173868,0.00009279946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984447,0.001008572,0.0001933139,0.00007524432,0.0002038933,0.00007426656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001501277,0.0000263938,0.0002215807,0.00005936737,0.0000165197,0.00004126187,0.00002988226,0.8298849,0.0002829575,0.1626395,0.001393265,0.005389398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001552557,0.00002447038,0.0001474934,0.00003828014,0.00001871217,0.00003943593,0.0000220305,0.8798605,0.0001576454,0.1137579,0.005903285,0.00001475015],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01951653,0.002672294,0.9172055,0.001875218,0.0002010057,0.0001352854,0.0006978385,0.0001498221,0.05754657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207871,0.008551589,0.1108702,0.000488697,0.0003456631,0.0009452981,0.0008646362,0.0001940518,0.05695271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008203476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02744335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05702831784412495,"score_gpt":0.2394714822999688,"score_spread":0.1824431644558438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}