{"id":"W2149284565","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2006.637","title":"WLC04-5: Bandwidth Allocation in 4G Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networks: A Noncooperative Game Theoretical Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Globecom","topic":"Wireless Networks and Protocols","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Computer network; Quality of service; Bandwidth allocation; Oligopoly; Wireless network; Dynamic bandwidth allocation; Nash equilibrium; Bandwidth (computing); Game theory; Wireless; Cournot competition; Mathematical optimization; Telecommunications; Microeconomics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001937492,0.0008078272,0.0008833635,0.0006093485,0.0006945719,0.001829706,0.001543014,0.001906645,0.003256122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002653746,0.0003248103,0.0007605568,0.0008070021,0.001825004,0.001721048,0.0009337781,0.001392736,0.0003497566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002571736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002700228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006799676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004289256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988263,0.0007475164,0.00002700159,0.0000947945,0.0001896801,0.0001146219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987558,0.0008453265,0.00008640262,0.00004720236,0.0001924085,0.00007279043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005743829,0.00008153062,0.000229602,0.00009360199,0.00003416028,0.0001194678,0.00009536213,0.663549,0.001068603,0.3154629,0.003736801,0.0154716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001723737,0.00002253251,0.00004718347,0.0000103776,0.000007554504,0.00002020622,0.00002024144,0.948745,0.0003100371,0.0489457,0.00184604,0.000007796139],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01107188,0.0002517987,0.9715368,0.00102618,0.0000752734,0.0001664813,0.00007253069,0.00006379798,0.0157353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7098863,0.0009518503,0.2709099,0.0007484065,0.0002107896,0.0007610648,0.000137455,0.00007810118,0.0163161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006799676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01865929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01084670687834844,"score_gpt":0.2574547205138765,"score_spread":0.246608013635528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}