{"id":"W2149292795","doi":"10.5558/tfc83358-3","title":"A framework for assessing climate change vulnerability of the Canadian forest sector","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Saskatchewan Research Council (Canada)","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; University of Waterloo; U.S. Forest Service; BIOCAP Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Adaptive capacity; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Adaptation (eye); Stakeholder; Forest management; Geography; Business; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Political science; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007598787,0.001395954,0.0007530234,0.01366613,0.00709041,0.007113533,0.002871606,0.001620875,0.004672943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009847182,0.0003823305,0.001176261,0.006298602,0.007466242,0.003052505,0.003850855,0.001795063,0.0002825907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05207085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06448127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8976551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9169394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951596,0.001760064,0.0002738047,0.0003410243,0.001685271,0.0007802641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953474,0.0008954478,0.0003110503,0.0001891606,0.002672388,0.0005846341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001689886,0.00004372534,0.01174992,0.0003057104,0.00008701198,0.0003456063,0.003860189,0.0410865,0.0004860051,0.8733456,0.01833693,0.05033582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003761506,0.00007787794,0.03185235,0.001659229,0.0001253113,0.000388634,0.0130397,0.06325983,0.0004250419,0.7030422,0.1858272,0.0002651042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06124721,0.009848763,0.5118257,0.04357868,0.000555966,0.003735882,0.01100126,0.0006348998,0.3575716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5706259,0.004642264,0.4111651,0.001435231,0.000143679,0.00203529,0.002052289,0.00006567862,0.007834549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1023449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3778022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03890680203547313,"score_gpt":0.302333655476613,"score_spread":0.2634268534411399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}