{"id":"W2149292795","doi":"10.5558/tfc83358-3","title":"A framework for assessing climate change vulnerability of the Canadian forest sector","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Saskatchewan Research Council (Canada)","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; University of Waterloo; U.S. Forest Service; BIOCAP Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Adaptive capacity; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Adaptation (eye); Stakeholder; Forest management; Geography; Business; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Political science; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009314307,0.0001194311,0.0001042907,0.00002185296,0.0006005702,0.00004817134,0.0005642658,0.00008774726,0.0006598295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000944888,0.00007161288,0.0001041815,0.0002968265,0.000405431,0.0001798368,0.0002099947,0.0001795677,0.00008672692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003866262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004622475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08553224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.535799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987748,0.00003642998,0.000194647,0.0001785363,0.0002092273,0.000606364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990557,0.0001632154,0.0001126664,0.00055505,0.000008029826,0.0001053443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003178656,0.00005138419,0.9321769,0.00006823442,0.0000148818,0.000001318822,0.001004483,0.0009902731,0.00009374473,0.05560588,0.002756807,0.007204327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002162553,0.00003973705,0.9608778,0.00003572594,0.00002186042,0.000001767803,0.00004369032,0.002946343,0.0003589495,0.01966675,0.01566512,0.0001259884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854662,0.00004130134,0.000240138,0.001605384,0.0002501674,0.0007527775,0.00002391694,0.00002243392,0.01159772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998301,0.000003340397,0.0006121545,0.0006024918,0.0002442063,0.00004103882,0.000003460769,0.00001756115,0.0001747783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4502667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9205573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03890680203547313,"score_gpt":0.302333655476613,"score_spread":0.2634268534411399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}