{"id":"W2149346353","doi":"10.1186/1478-4505-7-s1-s10","title":"SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 10: Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Health Research Policy and Systems","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; European Commission","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Equity (law); Health policy; Health services research; Health equity; Public economics; Social policy; Population; Public health; Population health; Medicine; Actuarial science; Environmental health; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Nursing; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2386289,0.0006647874,0.01037477,0.001860311,0.001927462,0.001588565,0.001088273,0.0004891109,0.00005768588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1851966,0.0005639694,0.0006490431,0.001100295,0.0002940133,0.001497209,0.0003110126,0.0009985364,0.0001918898],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007245059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02024213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01170252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003987894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9640156,0.0108639,0.02061227,0.001251227,0.0009631022,0.002293886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281614,0.04554816,0.02238982,0.002001207,0.0009238758,0.0009755457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000298826,0.00002431415,0.000004365114,0.8683547,0.0001099898,4.375924e-7,0.002532538,0.00000120027,6.661501e-9,0.0704742,0.04219726,0.01629802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002084412,0.0003471287,0.00001010036,0.6252939,0.00005209777,0.00006639231,0.0008520979,0.0002760844,1.450218e-8,0.00200924,0.3705585,0.0003259605],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002608737,0.922559,0.0007710113,0.05153582,0.0003113967,0.02331073,0.0004329205,0.0000469468,0.001029567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002634758,0.9809421,0.0005215049,0.01310043,0.001074885,0.003137234,0.0001684755,0.00008948049,0.0007023946],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3283612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9447497545830486,"score_gpt":0.7208305875862339,"score_spread":0.2239191669968147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}