{"id":"W2149455953","doi":"10.1109/gamenets.2009.5137414","title":"Bidding efficiently in repeated auctions with entry and observation costs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Bidding; Bayesian game; Computer science; Resource allocation; Microeconomics; Budget constraint; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Complete information; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Unique bid auction; Mathematical optimization; Game theory; Repeated game; Auction theory; Economics; Computer network; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008140274,0.001115815,0.003549428,0.0006546473,0.000777811,0.00389711,0.004404978,0.001839633,0.002843964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02240928,0.00137868,0.001558729,0.001121364,0.00179594,0.005579676,0.002026575,0.002098253,0.0007682227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001711206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002014414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002912303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002380565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916856,0.004503659,0.0004680084,0.001018353,0.001305297,0.00101911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840297,0.01065046,0.002177409,0.001854593,0.000796764,0.0004911477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007416175,0.0006133414,0.003153542,0.0002020655,0.0002602185,0.001001164,0.0005854358,0.7240523,0.00439825,0.2101844,0.001328422,0.05347919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001228549,0.0001115073,0.0003220403,0.000009750262,0.00002728969,0.0001668729,0.00004395762,0.9145372,0.0004381296,0.08364199,0.0005440031,0.00003436769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.104039,0.0001765112,0.8912457,0.0002581665,0.00002261083,0.0001904423,0.00007436501,0.0002190095,0.003774229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.831484,0.0001591112,0.1612964,0.00008335162,0.00004681291,0.0003930228,0.000148187,0.0001002834,0.006288769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008140274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04305041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0695017570966685,"score_gpt":0.3613627652144811,"score_spread":0.2918610081178126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}