{"id":"W2149587266","doi":"10.1109/achi.2009.37","title":"Investigating the Comprehension Support for Effective Visualization Tools – A Case Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Visualization; Program comprehension; Comprehension; GRASP; Set (abstract data type); Java; Software visualization; Human–computer interaction; Information visualization; Data visualization; Visual analytics; Data science; Software; Software engineering; Software development; Software system; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Software construction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01090927,0.0007330208,0.0005337394,0.002359238,0.001619793,0.002650594,0.001943163,0.003160632,0.002784053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0901722,0.000521982,0.0005360303,0.001616661,0.001598268,0.004145307,0.001440118,0.001361726,0.0003871547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001156808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001041463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001717475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002456384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902167,0.006686337,0.0005586265,0.0005600072,0.001483017,0.000495353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8256338,0.1528891,0.00477702,0.006538666,0.008650108,0.001511308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001500632,0.008665822,0.07541972,0.003197038,0.0001681349,0.03149047,0.4877618,0.01233842,0.07647527,0.0151607,0.009013955,0.2788081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235494,0.01294903,0.1386429,0.002143221,0.0006250853,0.02982575,0.2836892,0.1827324,0.2150575,0.01969929,0.1127218,0.0006783074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797035,0.0001552134,0.01479627,0.0007794457,0.000009030869,0.000298957,0.00009491373,0.0002856806,0.00387697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676723,0.0001740261,0.0302543,0.00008738079,0.00001324431,0.000273119,0.0001382749,0.00008377739,0.001303493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01090927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05769444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07379102057723444,"score_gpt":0.3822915253292135,"score_spread":0.308500504751979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}