{"id":"W2149764653","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2010.0002","title":"Ecological genetics of sex ratios in plant populations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Evolution of sexual reproduction; Ecology; Sex ratio; Sex allocation; Evolutionary biology; Population genetics; Taxon; Evolutionary ecology; Sexual selection; Dioecy; Reproductive isolation; Population; Demography; Genetics; Pollen","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004382613,0.000129703,0.0002578827,0.000007245947,0.0004436843,0.00001421699,0.0005618694,0.0002101,0.0002484273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007133382,0.00003988629,0.0003178767,0.0005129789,0.00120477,0.00003637297,0.00005670795,0.0003443975,0.000001903303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008908019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001176688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007891682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988046,0.0000875156,0.0003258135,0.0002694151,0.0002575416,0.0002551339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993476,0.0004100383,0.0001150851,0.00003258181,0.00003589274,0.00005883081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003749604,0.0009953282,0.648739,0.00001055287,0.00002997918,8.110292e-7,0.0001538965,0.0008578381,0.3332496,0.009045587,0.00006279528,0.006817148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001174169,0.0004465892,0.9710603,0.00001176103,0.00001257073,0.000002884906,0.0001859793,0.002587945,0.003499534,0.02156848,0.0003488944,0.0001576184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928505,0.00007344513,0.00002483964,0.006108541,0.00008967913,0.0001780008,0.000146831,0.00002142302,0.0005066837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991214,0.00006628961,0.0005730401,0.0001089833,0.00009618757,0.00001208776,0.000003494626,4.204627e-7,0.00001808593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3297501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4439026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1094753803389217,"score_gpt":0.2602075601532209,"score_spread":0.1507321798142992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}