{"id":"W2149795785","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2311.2009.01103.x","title":"Harem size and oviposition behaviour in a polygynous bark beetle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Entomology","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Harem; Biology; Polygyny; Competition (biology); Intraspecific competition; Zoology; Mating; Mating system; Ecology; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002093916,0.0001037351,0.0001523372,0.00003402033,0.00007550086,0.0000093545,0.0001243228,0.0001781793,0.006179961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008798378,0.00009088897,0.00002651714,0.0001222514,0.000168678,0.00007236687,0.0001347316,0.0001517828,0.0003592896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001182052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003597885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001374334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008325199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990343,0.00009840192,0.0001635234,0.0003043232,0.00007038667,0.0003291058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996784,0.0001016131,0.00003821408,0.0001053973,0.000002121037,0.00007420761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003065032,0.003136844,0.9260814,0.000007730122,0.00002027444,0.002186351,0.0007020127,0.0007050018,0.02364042,0.0176236,0.004913279,0.02067661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004363057,0.0008127383,0.9856993,0.000001277769,0.000007608652,0.0000584798,0.00001721244,0.00007343832,0.00008170621,0.01237622,0.0003332884,0.0001024432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861249,0.00002522791,0.0000222548,0.001007246,0.0001019323,0.0002204097,0.000001305722,0.00004150814,0.01245525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958186,0.00001671129,0.0004468889,0.002943876,0.00001542484,0.00002823935,0.000004060697,0.000003077632,0.0007231723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05961791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005791955010154386,"score_gpt":0.2226253697548383,"score_spread":0.2168334147446839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}