{"id":"W2149798814","doi":"10.1093/icb/45.5.924","title":"Using Upper Limits of \"Bateman Gradients\" to Estimate the Opportunity for Sexual Selection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fecundity; Sexual selection; Mating; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Investment (military); Operational sex ratio; Reproduction; Limit (mathematics); Parental investment; Demography; Variance (accounting); Mating system; Statistics; Ecology; Economics; Population; Mathematics; Computer science; Genetics; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003019079,0.0004290954,0.0005801216,0.002303586,0.0007626728,0.001480399,0.0004967765,0.0006108621,0.001538563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009732785,0.000287786,0.0007485849,0.0007785518,0.001215871,0.001386267,0.001458508,0.00124143,0.0003089669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007262687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003369735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002504023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003293831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984097,0.0007988408,0.0001122251,0.0002620743,0.000310252,0.000106736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944067,0.003572061,0.0008707069,0.0005716649,0.0003105925,0.0002682719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004536814,0.0001854226,0.4925218,0.0006440283,0.001643035,0.0004444832,0.00241184,0.03657201,0.04924597,0.1740746,0.003624918,0.2381783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003193509,0.0003046101,0.6801278,0.0001673011,0.0002064449,0.001330784,0.0006289202,0.07691287,0.008798501,0.2194006,0.01179126,0.0002990331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6270597,0.003552536,0.3370861,0.001022085,0.000115244,0.0001827121,0.0006048738,0.0009495468,0.02942732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642026,0.0003825226,0.03385201,0.0002100664,0.00004588427,0.0001250501,0.0002245668,0.00008580538,0.0008715201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003019079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01596659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3037924003041275,"score_gpt":0.3880367481161491,"score_spread":0.08424434781202161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}