{"id":"W2149798814","doi":"10.1093/icb/45.5.924","title":"Using Upper Limits of \"Bateman Gradients\" to Estimate the Opportunity for Sexual Selection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fecundity; Sexual selection; Mating; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Investment (military); Operational sex ratio; Reproduction; Limit (mathematics); Parental investment; Demography; Variance (accounting); Mating system; Statistics; Ecology; Economics; Population; Mathematics; Computer science; Genetics; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001147787,0.0001128901,0.0002184444,0.00001017211,0.0002551461,0.00001123995,0.00008439312,0.00003891717,0.00001982695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003645616,0.0000325351,0.00003430239,0.0001114912,0.0001251584,0.00004349677,0.00003038239,0.00005895104,0.000002477859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006249316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000162531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00656285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994241,0.00008541785,0.0001420006,0.0001659723,0.00003182859,0.000150674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999491,0.0002543289,0.00007129993,0.00001059021,0.0001257103,0.00004704684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002375166,0.00008525765,0.03544726,0.000003287789,0.00007760736,1.236101e-7,0.001722065,0.00001150578,0.9304897,0.01264178,0.001032956,0.01825097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005292706,0.007384766,0.6569322,0.00007192079,0.00007703151,0.00002815077,0.01549478,0.006030998,0.1736499,0.004041453,0.1351128,0.0006467637],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980208,0.0001581337,0.0001702401,0.0007680202,0.00002434944,0.0002462341,0.0000908902,0.00001078296,0.000510587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991176,0.00000999329,0.0003959074,0.0001621836,0.0001081821,0.00002502685,0.00001640556,3.099566e-7,0.0001643997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7568398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3662224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3037924003041275,"score_gpt":0.3880367481161491,"score_spread":0.08424434781202161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}