{"id":"W2149939780","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cps049","title":"The social benefits of increasing protected natural areas: an Eastern Canadian case study using the contingent valuation method","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Scope (computer science); Valuation (finance); Context (archaeology); Cost–benefit analysis; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Business; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002662272,0.0004233753,0.000406082,0.001173361,0.002237616,0.001440687,0.001068356,0.0004919232,0.001350248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007129522,0.0002124806,0.0005464116,0.002589186,0.001602316,0.0005401348,0.0006777356,0.0006184431,0.00003975864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03332381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0137265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9738016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985942,0.0004982828,0.00004029409,0.0001049206,0.0004245528,0.0003377765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952107,0.003180335,0.0003348765,0.0002157692,0.0008645347,0.0001937962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001018283,0.0004490431,0.3311309,0.000397877,0.0004802478,0.004136174,0.0059637,0.5030532,0.005761337,0.07214456,0.002473156,0.07299151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002081803,0.0004935323,0.4963932,0.0002236582,0.0004850324,0.001158061,0.01548154,0.4479009,0.003843597,0.015243,0.01820915,0.0003601388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852335,0.0002801414,0.001917562,0.0003057542,0.000004266866,0.0001103996,0.0003278266,0.000005807366,0.01181479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970129,0.0002217237,0.001831474,0.00001862774,0.000001767561,0.00001898989,0.00007120973,0.00000141942,0.0008218341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03332381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2417823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3086724046380238,"score_gpt":0.404537964892517,"score_spread":0.09586556025449322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}