{"id":"W2150168152","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.005","title":"Pollutant removal efficiency of native versus exotic common reed (Phragmites australis) in North American treatment wetlands","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Engineering","topic":"Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Phragmites; Wetland; Environmental science; Pollutant; Constructed wetland; Environmental engineering; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001028204,0.0002188996,0.0003663962,0.0000811792,0.00003640659,0.00001019731,0.0001759147,0.00004590515,0.0001738076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008576111,0.0001625745,0.0000755583,0.0004992308,0.0001604063,0.00005868742,0.0001004482,0.0001073561,0.00002665338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005372975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006366944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003975327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003778149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987683,0.00004722648,0.0003082427,0.000308097,0.0001869312,0.0003811708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993449,0.0002440144,0.00009082561,0.0002056808,0.000003961687,0.0001105896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002072205,0.000586255,0.7853009,0.00001039251,0.00005903747,0.0001754618,0.0005381457,0.1935129,0.003935895,0.0001660066,0.000003753704,0.01550407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001690105,0.001732898,0.9646456,0.000008806354,0.00002449318,0.00002237233,0.00005909061,0.02958567,0.001763488,0.00001072932,0.0002419155,0.0002148554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984741,0.00000521301,0.00006880771,0.00004552669,0.0001086926,0.0002078224,0.00001143018,0.00005959226,0.001018833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982178,0.000007120378,0.001675218,0.000007419413,0.0000173361,0.00002276427,0.000009247106,0.00001139025,0.00003175181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1793447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6629598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01252138203413883,"score_gpt":0.2115731640447377,"score_spread":0.1990517820105989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}