{"id":"W2150197358","doi":"10.1073/pnas.211329998","title":"Impact of <i>Bt</i> corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Insect Resistance and Genetics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":496,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Iowa State University; Dow AgroSciences; Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Agricultural Research Service; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; DuPont; Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Michigan State University; Purdue University; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Monarch butterfly; Pollen; Danaus; Biology; Genetically modified maize; Larva; Hybrid; Population; Agronomy; Pollen source; Butterfly; Toxicology; Botany; Horticulture; Pollinator; Pollination; Genetically modified crops; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001252597,0.0004083626,0.0002079454,0.0006439206,0.0005334937,0.0006896908,0.0003554144,0.0005523581,0.0004750743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001200603,0.0001091529,0.0004247012,0.000318649,0.0002536483,0.0003291442,0.0003856684,0.0002474279,0.0000689927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002012132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008047708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02692989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05787883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993234,0.0002215797,0.00003020299,0.00006602591,0.0003082136,0.00005060355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990809,0.0003539206,0.0002985749,0.00005887941,0.0001400973,0.00006760286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001526459,0.000293306,0.846925,0.0001520135,0.0003556381,0.000844361,0.0006257822,0.02287549,0.07699108,0.000695427,0.0004165427,0.04829895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003489534,0.002824618,0.935464,0.00003103458,0.0002770142,0.0005017907,0.0008199315,0.02185662,0.03517876,0.000910276,0.002072185,0.0000288673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980185,0.0001775245,0.0007187182,0.00007234258,0.000001104245,0.00001637659,0.0001350177,0.00001303983,0.0008474738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998159,0.0001942129,0.0009613524,0.00003464063,0.000002230623,0.00001048452,0.0002116652,0.000002905105,0.0004234408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02692989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05354625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04258563217634346,"score_gpt":0.3691492968004176,"score_spread":0.3265636646240741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}