{"id":"W2150317998","doi":"10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05513.x","title":"Comparison of two plant functional approaches to evaluate natural restoration along an old‐field – deciduous forest chronosequence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Espace pour la vie; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Chronosequence; Trait; Deciduous; Ecology; Silviculture; Ecological succession; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001571995,0.0001019802,0.0002006741,0.0001928875,0.0002993656,0.00004198209,0.0003327591,0.00003444612,0.00002268056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003497534,0.00008446656,0.00004589489,0.0005738357,0.000304704,0.001301473,0.00004165838,0.0001740617,0.00001888932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002000987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001036532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002045763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007299203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981638,0.00006681287,0.0005533907,0.0002146953,0.0008107183,0.0001905427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989222,0.0001243601,0.0005539533,0.0001337607,0.0001461325,0.0001196011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001150682,0.0001924069,0.4357958,0.000005357147,0.000008496174,0.00000406736,0.002762372,0.5076704,0.04155915,0.004354028,0.000103716,0.007429135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003239127,0.0008285182,0.8899512,0.00002131596,0.00001540647,0.00003593942,0.0002032472,0.09981192,0.005455177,0.003243684,0.00001503551,0.00009465991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794033,0.00007812399,0.01856584,0.0009445486,0.0003960088,0.0001239143,6.465339e-7,0.000007108371,0.0004804849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883925,0.000004272467,0.01119023,0.0003239433,0.00005260298,0.000002479597,0.000002122465,0.000002724619,0.00002910053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4541554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3444447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0977692429529556,"score_gpt":0.3435603172105013,"score_spread":0.2457910742575457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}