{"id":"W2150322478","doi":"10.1037/a0032608","title":"Two-tiered violence risk estimates: A validation study of an integrated-actuarial risk assessment instrument.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Services","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Predictive validity; Risk assessment; Psychology; Actuarial science; Construct validity; Poison control; Risk management tools; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Computer science; Computer security; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00104248,0.0006392301,0.0007911908,0.0002769285,0.0003022883,0.0002186311,0.001279472,0.0003451899,0.003880534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006613434,0.0004933981,0.0001543359,0.0007514409,0.0001864631,0.0006891084,0.0001590372,0.000900784,0.0005740381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009255697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000190113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01223123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000388057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994397,0.001378132,0.001267061,0.001469483,0.0006805115,0.0008078141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962154,0.000321507,0.001346822,0.001500806,0.0002394237,0.0003760091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001469661,0.01980265,0.6674667,0.00006674413,0.0009557207,0.00003248033,0.008526024,0.0002843423,0.001895268,0.001130213,0.002320515,0.2960497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007519072,0.008300453,0.9417289,0.0001371034,0.0003023247,0.00002986091,0.02572662,0.001869651,0.000096973,0.01324678,0.0002887094,0.0007535552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9623345,0.00008737758,0.0007000281,0.00007558119,0.0265756,0.001832712,0.0001014117,0.0003571443,0.007935643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896028,0.00003713517,0.008738191,0.0002584325,0.0007059425,0.000460389,0.0001174738,0.00005985817,0.00001979845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2952961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03023847392054263,"score_gpt":0.3650187348859918,"score_spread":0.3347802609654492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}