{"id":"W2150332422","doi":"10.22230/jem.2004v4n2a278","title":"Human Dimensions of Biodiversity Conservation in the Interior Forests of British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Ecosystem; Forest management; Measurement of biodiversity; Perception; Ecosystem services; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Forestry; Psychology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003329088,0.0001153253,0.0002115327,0.000837317,0.001753686,0.001680149,0.0003430219,0.0002092774,0.002993852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853804,0.0001144821,0.00009413261,0.001971046,0.0009652445,0.000290483,0.0005481829,0.0003889331,0.0001022363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01194647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004943236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9615839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997322,0.00007060869,0.00000898404,0.000023468,0.00006136784,0.0001034184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991502,0.000216288,0.0001166991,0.00002928553,0.0002234562,0.0002640463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002831497,0.0002092481,0.923036,0.0000861981,0.0000811899,0.0008399966,0.006734613,0.005052131,0.0008051526,0.003480526,0.004172393,0.05521938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001242839,0.00002695953,0.9821039,0.00004644114,0.00001601303,0.0001116911,0.01072079,0.002612937,0.00007640925,0.0007168274,0.003535617,0.00002001745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947169,0.0001891629,0.00005263685,0.0001803105,0.000001606213,0.000009351689,0.0001590845,0.000002560067,0.004688379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984441,0.0001386092,0.00007819921,0.00002203105,6.406491e-7,0.000005094572,0.00008257499,9.783528e-7,0.001227741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03841609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08667809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05002234822932402,"score_gpt":0.1975522312917429,"score_spread":0.1475298830624189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}