{"id":"W2150455393","doi":"10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.65","title":"A comparative analysis of two building rating systems. Part 2: Case study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Sustainability; Green building; Architectural engineering; Rating system; Water efficiency; Environmental resource management; Environmental design; Environmental economics; Engineering; Civil engineering; Business; Computer science; Environmental science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009642866,0.0003761578,0.001046237,0.0007898133,0.0001398898,0.00002285461,0.0004012944,0.00009396305,0.000004326174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005000511,0.0003391344,0.0003285632,0.002894252,0.0002069962,0.0003826149,0.0001150928,0.0003201211,6.799991e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006814425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001783128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003333341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001210808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976128,0.00002237036,0.001072173,0.0003207113,0.0005472013,0.0004246845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978615,0.0001796814,0.0003160353,0.0003379298,0.001201416,0.0001034363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001352886,0.0001914872,0.01464576,0.001558358,0.001108978,0.00002887033,0.003757465,0.9690936,0.00348295,0.006051282,0.00004443283,0.00002327815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001092556,0.0001802952,0.005709059,0.0002458321,0.001296191,0.0001875698,0.02407334,0.9498814,0.01658517,0.00006348131,0.000144482,0.0005405689],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788423,0.000298463,0.0188833,0.000008122015,0.0003297859,0.001107731,0.00001458011,0.0002319495,0.0002837739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989903,0.000008799451,0.0008140112,8.987304e-7,0.00004167473,0.0001002471,0.00000134863,0.00002537158,0.00001736616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02031588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01575154899860289,"score_gpt":0.2618308202981061,"score_spread":0.2460792712995032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}