{"id":"W2150455393","doi":"10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.65","title":"A comparative analysis of two building rating systems. Part 2: Case study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Sustainability; Green building; Architectural engineering; Rating system; Water efficiency; Environmental resource management; Environmental design; Environmental economics; Engineering; Civil engineering; Business; Computer science; Environmental science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02612654,0.0006337989,0.0007549853,0.007167389,0.001212231,0.002630057,0.001047493,0.0009423686,0.004584049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06028232,0.0004571752,0.001064492,0.008378579,0.001274637,0.002418332,0.001959487,0.0009036912,0.0007272585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003985008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009718182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01085572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02165368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9595276,0.02717599,0.001918126,0.00098189,0.009254331,0.001142061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8998662,0.07142438,0.004098879,0.003761539,0.01969529,0.001153601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008516631,0.002271336,0.3743324,0.004184813,0.0008296343,0.002390628,0.03280986,0.04103928,0.01578431,0.02607123,0.01011006,0.4816599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003648701,0.01058907,0.8113017,0.0008257687,0.0006318414,0.002324395,0.05826832,0.06423375,0.01676947,0.005592149,0.02863456,0.0004642199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456053,0.0009679598,0.01448798,0.000352705,0.00006356374,0.0009270158,0.0009952671,0.0001527477,0.0364474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819632,0.0002809846,0.01508255,0.00003530384,0.00001050611,0.000243063,0.0006646927,0.00003797882,0.001681681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02612654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.138172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01575154899860289,"score_gpt":0.2618308202981061,"score_spread":0.2460792712995032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}