{"id":"W2150465011","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02752.x","title":"A physiological analogy of the niche for projecting the potential distribution of plants","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Species distribution; Niche; Abiotic component; Range (aeronautics); Tree (set theory); Distribution (mathematics); Ecological niche; Ecology; Environmental niche modelling; Biology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004412845,0.00005714082,0.0001250562,0.00001871651,0.00009112091,0.000004663733,0.0002203145,0.00004464676,0.0004757675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005791977,0.00002666965,0.0003042083,0.0002270901,0.0002548071,0.00006672429,0.00007023884,0.00008457154,0.000001664775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003091269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004622671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003197392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006469442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992618,0.00006191574,0.0002637588,0.00004826839,0.0002044992,0.0001597738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999338,0.00004543234,0.0004622808,0.00009301527,0.0000272618,0.00003397313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002028916,0.0004971178,0.7906951,0.00001928827,0.00009183335,3.930517e-7,0.0002663837,0.00002628947,0.1967191,0.0005302448,0.009358591,0.001592803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002392553,0.0001357527,0.9846632,0.000008880375,0.00003607267,0.0000218986,0.001071058,0.00001172022,0.01011877,0.0001366327,0.003521693,0.00003501398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986719,0.0001542521,0.0001965162,0.0002586147,0.0002324927,0.0001168715,0.0002046676,0.000001734646,0.0001629911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997877,0.00005901995,0.00002272549,0.00004685113,0.00006546066,0.000002401576,0.00001147983,0.000001932262,0.000002430549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1939682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.520932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02822076572881891,"score_gpt":0.2577934847340163,"score_spread":0.2295727190051974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}