{"id":"W2150745872","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i3.595","title":"In Defense of Analogical Reasoning","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Analogical reasoning; Rebuttal; Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Analogy; CLARITY; Inference; Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Logical reasoning; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009898387,0.00004967579,0.0001007517,0.00008168225,0.0001513894,0.000007435801,0.0001153589,0.00002108976,0.0008209465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002367145,0.00003836332,0.0000364159,0.00003552395,0.0005326998,0.0004260677,0.00002266415,0.0000774974,0.00007149792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001016531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002066069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009855103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009186254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995344,0.000006746323,0.0001643876,0.00005910773,0.0001105636,0.0001248313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998142,0.00001649689,0.00005145869,0.00006537507,0.00002399728,0.00002846241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700788,0.00002566426,0.0007350234,0.000004925852,0.000001131643,0.000030349,0.01428055,0.00003277903,0.00001249411,0.9843224,0.0004122085,0.0001254624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001298707,0.001312167,0.03258232,0.00008621304,0.00001118234,0.0002125874,0.003494407,0.0006773249,0.000169053,0.1036027,0.8558503,0.0007029902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3422369,0.0000616109,0.000003370445,0.00005593617,0.0000993416,0.00002287129,0.000002643066,0.00001225537,0.6575051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981807,0.0000117208,0.0001097175,0.0005646804,0.0000842123,0.000001819701,0.00000111781,0.000001242104,0.001044768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07993744814897633,"score_gpt":0.2309389555553458,"score_spread":0.1510015074063695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}