{"id":"W2150781284","doi":"10.1186/1748-7161-8-12","title":"The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scoliosis","topic":"Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Grading (engineering); Medicine; Scoliosis; Systematic review; Observational study; Identification (biology); Evidence-based medicine; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Management science; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4797008,0.006903465,0.01621152,0.0348814,0.003865355,0.01245516,0.01192064,0.01333273,0.02192319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6854703,0.005941224,0.02578883,0.02838799,0.005346668,0.01370083,0.01061513,0.00936906,0.00396609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02279739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05787174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007347851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01254941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4554661,0.3984895,0.1038806,0.01344664,0.02666012,0.002057107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3487224,0.5015285,0.05308509,0.02268146,0.07154458,0.002438066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006673925,0.0001390928,0.001343976,0.6941562,0.01388085,0.0003926938,0.005601385,0.003533814,0.0003483587,0.03190034,0.04844828,0.1995876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003490459,0.0004781233,0.002600379,0.7062635,0.03450113,0.0004398388,0.003392223,0.008062116,0.001298579,0.1125179,0.1262857,0.0006701092],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002145402,0.1071445,0.3237244,0.04524193,0.00607844,0.4873435,0.01783461,0.001279282,0.00920797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008738941,0.01747768,0.5637689,0.002744574,0.0003972486,0.4048235,0.001318425,0.00009617762,0.0006346398],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5202992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6416215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08212256514698463,"score_gpt":0.4163933830833046,"score_spread":0.33427081793632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}