{"id":"W2150835538","doi":"10.1109/coginf.2011.6016167","title":"Validation of a generic GQM based measurement framework for software projects from industry practitioners","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Calgary; General Electric","keywords":"Software project management; Schedule; Computer science; Stakeholder; Project management; Software metric; Relevance (law); Metric (unit); Process management; Software development; Quality (philosophy); Project management triangle; Software; Software quality; Software engineering; Engineering management; Systems engineering; Engineering; Software construction; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08743232,0.0008604795,0.0006506389,0.004552635,0.001693669,0.002571009,0.001849507,0.001853665,0.001239635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1719132,0.0004330313,0.0007712021,0.003719939,0.001823828,0.003406157,0.003539028,0.001600558,0.0003924555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004128326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008637442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003714403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00372499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9443333,0.03749083,0.00656273,0.002521699,0.007766555,0.001324935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8602133,0.0712383,0.00716697,0.01697303,0.04252936,0.001878906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006066504,0.004819619,0.2014661,0.003194815,0.0001733714,0.0006311091,0.1073091,0.02130282,0.02988563,0.06619874,0.006782726,0.5576292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000910381,0.009501873,0.4972568,0.004288125,0.0003700044,0.001583417,0.1026056,0.1910067,0.0275823,0.07406053,0.0903082,0.0005261234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.574373,0.0002000148,0.4006418,0.001968406,0.0001012692,0.008602043,0.0005917817,0.000542833,0.01297873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6285222,0.0001171222,0.3601415,0.0003092126,0.00001442472,0.008950321,0.001126004,0.00009453932,0.0007246798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08743232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4623918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1425646335619076,"score_gpt":0.2989706839045456,"score_spread":0.156406050342638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}