{"id":"W2150901191","doi":"10.5558/tfc82344-3","title":"Arthropods as ecological indicators of sustainability in Canadian forests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological indicator; Ecology; Indicator value; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Arthropod; Indicator species; Geography; Habitat; Biology; Ecosystem; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002938451,0.00009277771,0.0001399434,0.00002197717,0.0002949748,0.00000970625,0.0002929312,0.0001274523,0.000441268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008097055,0.00003218137,0.00006451274,0.000378526,0.0005404043,0.00005318254,0.0001002163,0.0001363305,0.00003208948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002387493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001119246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3754807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990561,0.00006657992,0.0001670986,0.000167952,0.00009545106,0.0004467891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996325,0.0001394281,0.00005970765,0.00006615133,0.00003417218,0.00006807259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002261203,0.00009819188,0.9930533,0.000004572345,0.000005128668,0.00001404105,0.00003414453,0.00007647344,0.00003574447,0.004445206,0.001110436,0.001100112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334568,0.0002764464,0.9761862,0.000002643872,0.000004877184,0.000003024066,0.0003148581,0.00001999894,0.0001930917,0.01490895,0.007881889,0.00007463499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992632,0.0001355729,4.760627e-8,0.005018672,0.00004595273,0.0002404994,0.00002585907,0.00001708941,0.001884351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996753,0.000008018867,0.000002888021,0.00009541115,0.00005364974,0.0000101532,0.00001932872,3.704416e-7,0.0001348181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5682603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.628678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007060390181915572,"score_gpt":0.214302550128577,"score_spread":0.2072421599466615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}