{"id":"W2150929025","doi":"10.1139/x03-274","title":"Range of variability in boreal aspen plant communities after wildfire and clear-cutting","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Clearcutting; Understory; Basal area; Boreal; Species richness; Plant community; Forestry; Environmental science; Range (aeronautics); Taiga; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Biodiversity; Geography; Forb; Vegetation (pathology); Canopy; Biology; Grassland","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006325715,0.00007944329,0.0002026318,0.0002412513,0.0001137006,0.00004767555,0.0003493359,0.00007167413,0.0001557594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004249828,0.00006990899,0.00003477822,0.0002760226,0.0005958918,0.0002461753,0.00007130831,0.0005813363,0.00001145676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006861651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003439897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4725409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8379552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981244,0.000619542,0.0003276724,0.00009259584,0.0004053031,0.0004304799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988264,0.00043256,0.00008234343,0.0002076637,0.00002972019,0.0004213375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006367709,0.00001882386,0.9939564,0.00003349379,0.000006091332,0.0002474177,0.002574224,0.000117833,0.00001465656,0.00007196131,0.00007679771,0.002818547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004579603,0.0002505297,0.9964195,0.0002440216,0.000002440646,0.0001271683,0.0005938533,0.0002112261,0.00004810017,0.001194358,0.0003871951,0.00006360752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956293,0.0001212824,0.000006531731,0.0003644416,0.00004751482,0.0001849971,0.00002073257,0.000001314234,0.003623944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997598,0.00001429995,0.0001469501,0.00001964403,0.0000318472,0.000004849394,0.000001300673,0.00001026878,0.00001105848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3654143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5309715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02187709871082858,"score_gpt":0.2616762787587315,"score_spread":0.2397991800479029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}