{"id":"W2151039721","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2004.1336247","title":"Preliminary hazard analysis for the design alternatives based on fuzzy methodology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04.","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Polytechnique Montréal","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Maintainability; Operability; Computer science; Hazard; Ranking (information retrieval); Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004568956,0.0009058132,0.0007519274,0.003823804,0.0007821334,0.002191341,0.0009237244,0.0007107926,0.009458699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00970987,0.000378139,0.001623019,0.001812457,0.0008090733,0.001584113,0.0006668227,0.0009005179,0.0005437087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001977849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002009023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002490098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002441448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975684,0.000970799,0.00009646879,0.0001429204,0.001085775,0.0001356266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963859,0.002650449,0.000166529,0.0001073634,0.0006435755,0.00004618131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002306006,0.0001497662,0.001313769,0.0006943382,0.0001054179,0.0002569022,0.0007199348,0.4794207,0.00841742,0.2559232,0.001834419,0.2509335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004132196,0.0004451967,0.0009921207,0.0001303835,0.00007216321,0.0001335967,0.0002582822,0.8711348,0.004167276,0.1134546,0.009114332,0.00005601385],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01303837,0.0001569098,0.9806383,0.00006725386,0.00001612745,0.0002617904,0.00006083881,0.00007553281,0.005685046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3155816,0.00035867,0.6785241,0.00004575894,0.00003100921,0.0008401565,0.0001758048,0.00003964361,0.004403254],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009458699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0316425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1753780451932271,"score_gpt":0.4083853243582305,"score_spread":0.2330072791650034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}