{"id":"W2151289909","doi":"10.1029/2006jg000380","title":"The role of historical fire disturbance in the carbon dynamics of the pan‐boreal region: A process‐based analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Carbon sink; Ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Fire regime; Carbon cycle; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Climatology; Boreal; Terrestrial ecosystem; Taiga; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003377355,0.0001281705,0.0003699653,0.00001672878,0.0001702343,0.000027713,0.00141321,0.00007243916,0.000009489535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001028396,0.00005797859,0.0003337655,0.002511044,0.0006196429,0.00009561665,0.0001351946,0.0008111705,0.000001666632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009174873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001077765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01231557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009993858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957153,0.0007308661,0.0006276395,0.0001804873,0.002295687,0.00045006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962138,0.002495254,0.0005121793,0.0005320699,0.0001501161,0.00009658666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009396021,0.001086943,0.9312439,0.00007155239,0.0001949864,0.00007178977,0.001393006,0.002135404,0.001096288,0.0004550309,0.0007914499,0.06052005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003116835,0.0005448449,0.8987762,0.00007713379,0.00006602547,0.000006805437,0.001033021,0.09520761,0.0008099718,0.002197035,0.0008843597,0.00008526231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960018,0.0004687179,0.0000554944,0.001353583,0.00005702367,0.0002619831,0.000001724677,0.000002352169,0.001797285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996584,0.00002066179,0.00004357766,0.00001457693,0.0000952305,0.000008134165,3.626277e-7,0.00001013338,0.0001489308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09307221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009940450177014747,"score_gpt":0.2708063673243571,"score_spread":0.2608659171473424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}