{"id":"W2151341073","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.026","title":"The social and cultural shaping of medical evidence: Case studies from pharmaceutical research and obstetric science","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; Fogarty International Center","keywords":"Criticism; Ideology; Evidence-based medicine; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Alternative medicine; MEDLINE; Medicine; Social science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06069612,0.0006116521,0.0009845054,0.005398563,0.01960546,0.01232201,0.002941267,0.007922969,0.003517895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1482967,0.001067515,0.000797058,0.007404769,0.03414429,0.009389826,0.01433341,0.006349816,0.0002035775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01158251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01146774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01700832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02950788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9027275,0.085982,0.002295578,0.001233484,0.004371795,0.003389561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6342407,0.3422763,0.01001901,0.00487695,0.005051645,0.003535378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001931684,0.0003330978,0.02191976,0.0006046229,0.0001119934,0.01056051,0.8876113,0.0003169731,0.0002892402,0.05555858,0.001361644,0.02113902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007741257,0.0001550047,0.008501876,0.001475436,0.0001192949,0.004327368,0.9488986,0.0003861525,0.0005214206,0.01663615,0.0188362,0.00006515237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9284135,0.007439204,0.002833759,0.02614633,0.000103159,0.0001881713,0.00005258884,0.000008864368,0.0348145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950922,0.002246178,0.001260765,0.0008178853,0.00003088913,0.00007030787,0.00001057939,0.00001025157,0.0004610408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3209956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8452964873400026,"score_gpt":0.7214283540209789,"score_spread":0.1238681333190237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}